A quieter workflow for pitches worth reading.
EDITH gives writers a clean submission flow and gives editors a focused review queue, without the clutter of a generic SaaS dashboard.
Pitch, track, and keep a clean record of your work.
This side of EDITH is built for active pitching. Writers see live brief availability, pitch status, and profile context without the publisher queue getting in the way.
Process3 steps
- 1
Submit to open briefs
Writers move from live availability to a clean submission without sorting through the editorial queue.
- 2
Track accepted, pending, and passed pitches
Every response stays visible as the pitch moves through review, so status never disappears into email.
- 3
Maintain your portfolio and profile
Work samples, profile context, and pitch history stay attached to the same workspace over time.
Review the queue and manage briefs without writer-facing noise.
This side of EDITH is for editors. Publishers move through incoming submissions, change statuses, and manage open calls from a workflow designed around decisions, not submissions.
Process3 steps
- 1
Review pending submissions
Editors get a tighter decision surface with open pitches grouped around active briefs and current review work.
- 2
Update outcomes and feedback
Accepted, pending, and passed decisions stay structured so writers and editors are looking at the same record.
- 3
Publish and manage live briefs
Brief availability, intake, and queue management live in one editorial workflow instead of separate tools.
A clearer system for pitching, review, and editorial follow-through.
EDITH gives each side its own workspace without breaking the shared record. Writers pitch, track responses, and maintain their profile. Publishers manage briefs, review the queue, and move work forward with cleaner decisions.